So, in each of the bulletins since October 1st I have put in a little blurb, explaining more about ad orientem, sharing an anecdote from other places that have had it, or presenting things I had to skip in the homily. So today I am bundling the first four of these blurbs here for those who don't have a stack of St. Wenceslaus bulletins at home.
Blurbs 5-8 found here and 9-10 found here.
Blurbs 5-8 found here and 9-10 found here.
I. Last weekend I explained that
for at least the next year, St. Wenceslaus would be celebrating Mass ad orientem, that is, with the priest
and the people united, facing the same direction. If you missed that homily, or
want to revisit it, visit the parish website. We have placed the text and the
audio near the top. Over the coming weeks I am going to share here some of the
insights that didn’t make the homily, but for the core reasoning, you’ll need
to hear the homily itself.
A hard decision I had to make
was whether to catechize about “AO” for weeks ahead of time, or just preach the
one homily and then start at that very Mass. I was keenly aware that many of
the changes in the ‘60s and ‘70s were done with minimal pre-teaching. But as
some students noted, this was a far smaller change than the translation changes
we had in 2011. So I decided it was better not to break things up and risk
people having too much time to overthink it, talk to anyone else, or go hide in
another parish. Instead, everyone heard the reasoning and then two minutes
later we were all praying, facing God the Father together. So far almost every
response has been positive, especially among young people. Thank you for
walking alongside me in this pilgrimage!
II. In the homily introducing ad orientem worship, I said that I think
praying this way will make us better prayers (pray-ers). Another thing it
should do is free us from mixing up what parts are conversation with God and
what parts are conversation with the priest. These ideas overlap in a
conversation a priest in our diocese had with a woman in his parish after they
started ad orientem. She said
"Father, I feel free now. When you looked at us the whole Mass, I felt I
needed to look back, as a courtesy and to show I'm listening. Now, in the parts
where we are talking to God, I can close my eyes, I can look down. I don't feel
I always have to look at you. I can pray naturally."
This makes sense to me. Most
faithful Catholics want to show they are attentive, focused, listening
participants. But for many that means sacrificing what might be a more natural
posture and style of prayer because they feel they need to show the priest (and
others) "I'm listening!" AO
frees us to pray, without worrying about signaling the priest our attention.
III. A line commonly heard when
discussing Mass ad orientem (or when
discussing the pre-1965 “Traditional Latin Mass”) is that “Father had his back
to us.” There is a lot more in that line than I can go into here, but I have
done some research on this and, interestingly, that complaint is basically
nowhere to be found in writings in 1950 or 1960. It seems to only appear after
the priest was encouraged to face the people (1965-70), and is used by
liturgists and catechists to open the people up to the change, e.g. “Isn’t this
nice? Father used to have his back to you, but now he’s looking at you.” A
priest in Lincoln a couple years ago turned the celebrant and server chairs 90°,
from facing the people to facing inward, much like our chairs. A woman said,
“Father, I’m upset because I can’t see your face anymore.” The priest replied,
“Then, sadly, we were doing it wrong.” His point, and it applies to the
Introductory Rites and the Eucharistic Prayer alike, was that Mass has never
been about the celebrant, and should never be about him or his connection to
the people. I understand how there was appeal in being told “Father won’t have
his back to us any more,” but I don’t think the liturgists who first said it realized
what clarity they actually already possessed and what confusion they were
beginning.
IV. In the homily when I
introduced ad orientem I asked a
question, “Does this have anything to do with the building campaign/sanctuary
renovation?” and my answer was “No… and a tiny yes.” That “yes” is: We should
take some time with ad orientem
before we have to decide about what kind of renovation we want.
I’ve talked to several
priests throughout the country who restored sanctuaries and put beautiful, tall
altarpieces in again. When asked if those additions changed much in the parish
they all said some version of “Well, we get more weddings requests and more
pictures on Christmas.”
I call this the “backdrop
effect”, and we don’t want it. We don’t want to spend $50,000 on a pretty
backdrop with no appreciable change in how we pray and think. To me, the
backdrop effect seems sensible in Mass facing the people. When the priest is
facing the people, the mental path goes between him and the people, and so the
altarpiece is background. But when we are facing the same direction, the mental
path goes from the people, through the priest, and on up and in. When we say
Mass ad orientem, the sanctuary
furnishings are organically more of a part of the worship.